Commentary

Regular readers may recall my quoting a spokesperson for Rodney Joffe, aka Tech Executive-1 in Special Counsel John Durham’s latest report, of being apolitical with no previous work for a political party.  I asked, did Michael Sussmann (the Clinton campaign lawyer) inform Joffe that he represented the Clinton campaign when he hired him to infiltrate computer servers in Trump Tower and the White House?

While the leftist media are doing their best to ignore this shocking story, Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberley A. Strassel isn’t about to let it die.

Challenging the suggestion that Joffe was “apolitical,” Strassel writes of one of his project colleagues, Paul Vixie, who has “a long record of liberal and anti-Trump sentiments.”

Strassel also reports of L. Jean Camp, an Indiana University computer-science professor and Clinton supporter, who recruited Americans to join the “resistance” against Trump.  Camp published the data for Sussmann, which was later provided to the FBI and CIA.

If they were so concerned with the national security, Strassel wonders why didn’t they go directly to the federal government with their findings.  Instead, Joffe took it to Sussmann, widely known as an attorney for the Democrat National Campaign.

And remember the involvement of Fusion GPS in the Russian dossier fabrication? Surely, you haven’t forgotten the deep state DOJ couple Bruce and Nellie Ohr who were connected to Fusion GPS. 

Strassel revealed that the “apolitical” Joffe attended a Fusion GPS meeting where the Russian Alpha Bank was discussed.  How could Joffe be so blind as to not see the political nature of it all.

In a most revealing discovery by Strassel, she learned that the “apolitical” Joffe participated in a 2018 New Yorker piece that pushed the Trump-Alpha bank claim, anonymously calling himself “Max.”

In the article, Joffe, aka “Max”, explained how vitally important it was in 2016 to make sure the threat his team discovered was “known before the election.” 

It hasn’t gone unnoticed that it was Joffe’s spokesperson who claimed Joffe was “apolitical,” not Joffe himself.  The truth remains for a grand jury.

The Clinton Response

On Friday, during a speaking appearance at a meeting of the Democrat Party of New York, Hillary Clinton, the grande dame of political corruption, said “By the way, they’re coming after me again lately.  You may have noticed.”

Of all people to tell Democrats what needed to be done, Hillary stated, “Now it should be clear to all of that the struggle for unity and democracy is far from over.”

Referring to continued conspiracy efforts by Trump, Clinton suggested that a piece in Vanity Affair magazine, of all media outlets, is confirmation of her opinion of the Durham investigation.  An excerpt of the partisan Clinton article by Bess Levin follows:

“Imagine, if you will, that a special counsel appointed by the federal government declared in a court filing that he had evidence that a major political figure – let’s call her Hillary Clinton – had paid spies to infiltrate the White House and run surveillance on Donald Trump in order to frame him as a foreign asset.  The whole thing would be a big flipping deal!  The country for which there would be major, major consequences and far-reaching fall out.

“The country, nay, the world would be gripped by the story, and for good reason – a former candidate for office spying on the president? In the White House?  That would be crazy! And you’re right – it would be crazy if something like that had actually happened.  Which it didn’t though unfortunately for reason, logic, and the concept of truth, Donald Trump and Fox News, and various other deranged conservatives cannot be convinced of that.

Of course, Levin and Hillary know it would be “a big flipping deal,” and there would be “major consequences and far-reaching fall out” if the American people were given the facts.  That’s why the complicit media is attempting to hide the facts from them, as they did with the corruption of the Biden family before the last election.

Clinton pledged to campaign heavily for Democrat candidates in the midterms, but one wonders if they will want her on the same stage.

Where Americans Stand

Sixty eight percent of likely voters believe the Durham accusation is important, including 50 percent who view it “very important.”  Majorities in every political category – 78 percent of Republicans, 57 percent of Democrats and 69 percent not affiliated with either major party, believe Durham’s allegation that the Clinton campaign paid an internet company to infiltrate Trump computer servers is at least somewhat important.

Interestingly, 67 percent of whites, 69 percent of blacks and 73 percent of other minorities believe the infiltration of the servers to be somewhat important.

It tells you that some likely voters are aware of the Durham story despite the media effort to keep it quiet. There is a 95 percent level of confidence in the survey, conducted on February 15-16, 2022.

Now, more than ever … may God continue to bless the United States of America.