“ … the deck is still stacked in favor of those already at the top. And there’s something wrong with that. There’s something wrong when CEOs make 300 times more than the typical worker.” – Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton poses with the late Oscar de la Renta, designer of the simple dress she is wearing. By the smiles on their faces I wonder If she just said, if those Iowa farm girls could see me now. (eonline.com)
While the latest news of corruption from the Clinton crime family is sorted out, and we are again told there’s no shred of evidence, let’s return to Hillary’s initial campaign charges in the above quote.
It’s more of the Obama tactic of dividing the country between what they term the “haves” and the “have-nots.” It’s more talk of a livable wage and increasing the minimum wage. Gender pay inequality. It’s talk of CEOs making unimaginable salaries at the those big corporations making big profits.
The low-information voters eat that up. They still see Obama as someone who feels their pain and wants to level the playing field. But in six years what have they experienced? Fewer jobs and lower wages, as the number of people on food stamps has increased by two-thirds. Unemployment among blacks is twice the rate of whites.
Despite the facts, word out of focus groups tells the Hillary campaign that attacking the “haves” still works with their people, so look for Hillary to continue to follow Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals (#6), which states, “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”
Don’t expect the “taker class” to question the deleted e-mails, her $300,000 speaking fees, and foreign money funneled through the Clinton foundation during her years at secretary of state. And don’t expect them to blame her for the deaths at Benghazi during her watch, because after all, what difference does it make?
