Did you notice how Hillary Clinton responded when asked who she would appoint to the Supreme Court?
Citizens United sought and won the right to pay for production costs of it’s documentary on Hillary. (Graphic courtesy moviespictures.org.)
First, she took a shot at repealing Citizens United, the Court decision that ruled corporations and unions have the same political speech rights as individuals under the First Amendment. It was Citizens United that sought and won the right to pay for the production of a documentary on Hillary’s fitness to be president.
She followed with “I want to appoint Supreme Court justices who understand the way the world really works.” Her way of disguising her advocacy for individuals who support a “living” Constitution; someone who believes that the original meaning or intent is sometimes unacceptable. Hillary contends that the framers of the Constitution wrote in broad, flexible terms to permit pragmatic decision outcomes.
Donald Trump has put forth the names of some 20 individuals who are Constitutional originalists.
God help us if Hillary is elected president.
(If you would like a free subscription to kramerontheright, simply scroll to the bottom of the column at right.)
